Date
1 - 18 of 18
Corrupt xtq file? #Parameter
Robert Scott
It appears that there is a problem with the xtq file, in that when I start up, the parameter files from last session do not load and I get an error message. When I open the library, I get another error message saying," Scale on2 1/2 not valid, please check your xtrkcad.xtq file." The layout scale is properly set to HO.
What more can I tell you? Thanks. B
|
|
I think the issue is that the definition for on2 has changed so that it lines up with the O family properly. (to “On2” perhaps- note upper case O). Let me see the .xtc and I’ll see what’s up. If I’m right we can simply change the scales in the xtc. Adam
It appears that there is a problem with the xtq file, in that when I start up, the parameter files from last session do not load and I get an error message. When I open the library, I get another error message saying," Scale on2 1/2 not valid, please check your xtrkcad.xtq file." The layout scale is properly set to HO. --
Adam Richards
|
|
I have a fix that looks for lowercase if no uppercase matches exist so with that the older .xtc files would be read ok and upgraded on next save.
I also found that the grouping of gauges under scales did not work so well for scales with (xx) in them (EU), (Fine) etc. So I fixed that also in a second fix. The bypass for now with 5.1.2a is to do a Find and Replace for all " on2 "s in the .xtc with a text editor and make them into " On2 "s. (Obviously save it as a copy and then have xtrkcad open that). Adam
|
|
Robert Scott
It would appear that the choice of scale in the options/layout menu is not reflected in the parameter dialogue. I understand that, as designed, it will not load parameter files on start if the scale of the layout doesn't match the scale of the parameter file. There was a typo error when I transcribe the error message, changing the upper case O to lower case. Bob
On Wednesday, January 6, 2021, 05:17:38 a.m. EST, Adam Richards <adamjmrichards@...> wrote: I have a fix that looks for lowercase if no uppercase matches exist so with that the older .xtc files would be read ok and upgraded on next save. I also found that the grouping of gauges under scales did not work so well for scales with (xx) in them (EU), (Fine) etc. So I fixed that also in a second fix. The bypass for now with 5.1.2a is to do a Find and Replace for all " on2 "s in the .xtc with a text editor and make them into " On2 "s. (Obviously save it as a copy and then have xtrkcad open that). Adam
|
|
Robert,
Can I get a copy of the .xtc file in question, please? I can then test to see what is actually going on. Actually, I may need to look at the custom parameters file xtrkcad.cus from your working directory and as well. It is odd, then but I am wondering, now I look carefully about a "On2 1/2" because I can't find that anywhere in our source. Could that be something someone has added as we don't seem to have it.. We treat the space as significant in the name - so On21/2 or On2-1/2 (or even On2.5) would be a better choice. I agree it is odd if all you have is HO, but that string in the scale position of a definition must definitely be coming from somewhere. Adam
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:36 AM Robert Scott via groups.io <sparky1bob=yahoo.ca@groups.io> wrote:
--
Adam Richards
|
|
Now I get part of the issue - this is actually a religious naming war .... http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/88/t/143939.aspx
It turns out that On2 1/2 is what most people (and by far the largest manufacturer of scale "stuff") call On30. But there are folks who want to call it "O n two-and-a-half" and they believe the others are wrong (and vice versa) based on On2, On3, etc. So here's the issue - we could add a On2-1/2 identical to the On30. But we have six parm files for On30 and none for On2-1/2. So there's a dilemma for you - as we are trying to help folks find and build it would seem obvious that we HAVE to have On30. If we add On2-1/2 we might soothe some folks, but we would be adding confusion later when newbies try and find suitable parms. At any rate, the issue is not lower vs upper case!! Adam
|
|
knorosow
Adam,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
to add even more confusion, in continental Europe this gauge is named "Oe". Rails are the same 16.5mm/0.65in, but scale varies: 1:48 in the US and Australia, 1:43.5 in the UK and France, for the rest of the European continent it's 1:45. In the UK, some people use O16.5 to name it. Furthermore sometimes the "O" is displaced by "0". For newbies, to get out of this swamp it may be useful to add a wiki page with a comparison list of all names used in parameter files and their matchables. If You think this to be helpful for beginners, i would try to compile such a list. -knorosow Am 06.01.21 um 20:24 schrieb Adam Richards:
/*Now*/ I get part of the issue - this is actually a religious naming
|
|
Jane Sullivan
On 06/01/2021 19:24, Adam Richards wrote:
/*Now*/ I get part of the issue - this is actually a religious naming war .... http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/88/t/143939.aspx <http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/88/t/143939.aspx>Can you make On2-1/2 and On2 1/2 aliases for On30? Best wishes -- Jane Sullivan Beckenham
|
|
On 06/01/2021 20:50, knorosow wrote:
In the UK, some people use O16.5 to name it.In the UK, most narrow gauge scales are referred to that way - without the "n", just the scale name and the gauge of the model in millimetres. But it wouldn't be a real "thing" if the UK and US didn't disagree on what it's called :P
|
|
Yes. Please!!
I started something similar in a post to the development sub-group - - https://xtrackcad.groups.io/g/development/topic/notes_on_scales_and_gauges_in/78482791?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,78482791 These were notes I used to add more scales surrounding O and S. Just now I have
SCALEFIT TURNOUT EXACT On2-1/2,Oe(EU),On16.5 On30 There is code when searching parm file contents titles to change user input from "00" to "OO", "H0" to "HO" and "0" to "O".
|
|
Robert Scott
Appears Norton will not let me copy and paste xtc files. Their help section contains nothing but offers to buy more software. The owners of Semantic are not putting their customers first, but instead limit the approved software to companies they are affiliated with. Their mission statement does not include supplying quality, functional software. Save your money.
On Wednesday, January 6, 2021, 12:09:35 p.m. EST, Adam Richards <adamjmrichards@...> wrote: Robert, Can I get a copy of the .xtc file in question, please? I can then test to see what is actually going on. Adam
Adam Richards
|
|
Hi Robert,
Just to understand what is going wrong: if you post a reply and try to attach a .xtc-file via the paperclip, you can either drag and drop, or you can browse for a file. Neither of these functions work? If so, please stop Norton for a short moment (it should offer that option somewhere) and try again. Otherwise I would suggest to remove Norton completely and switch to a more user friendly (and less resource hungry) anti virus tool (like the free Avast or alike). Joost
|
|
Radgoate
Robert,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Sadly, you have hit the nail on the head.... There is only one group of people who benefit from the proliferation of computer viruses and malware - those who sell the ‘solution’ to the problem they created.... 😡😡😡
On 8 Jan 2021, at 13:18, Robert Scott via groups.io <sparky1bob@...> wrote:
|
|
Robert, It is a normal text file. So you could rename it to .txt, or even open it with a text editor and copy and paste the contents into a new .txt and paste that. Adam
--
Adam Richards
|
|
Robert Scott
K. Thanks, If Norton were functional, ... Bob
On Friday, January 8, 2021, 10:39:24 a.m. EST, Adam Richards <adamjmrichards@...> wrote: Robert, It is a normal text file. So you could rename it to .txt, or even open it with a text editor and copy and paste the contents into a new .txt and paste that. Adam
Adam Richards
|
|
Robert Scott
Good info. Thanks. Bob
On Friday, January 8, 2021, 09:54:34 a.m. EST, Joost van der Waa <register@...> wrote: Hi Robert, Just to understand what is going wrong: if you post a reply and try to attach a .xtc-file via the paperclip, you can either drag and drop, or you can browse for a file. Neither of these functions work? If so, please stop Norton for a short moment (it should offer that option somewhere) and try again. Otherwise I would suggest to remove Norton completely and switch to a more user friendly (and less resource hungry) anti virus tool (like the free Avast or alike). Joost
|
|
Robert Scott
On Friday, January 8, 2021, 10:39:24 a.m. EST, Adam Richards <adamjmrichards@...> wrote: Robert, It is a normal text file. So you could rename it to .txt, or even open it with a text editor and copy and paste the contents into a new .txt and paste that. Adam
Adam Richards
|
|
OK that layout file does not contain any references to other than HO scale.
I think it must either be in one of the param files you are loading at startup (names are taken from in the xtrkcad.ini file) or the custom parms you have (in the xtrkcad.cus file). First you can try unloading all parm files and then looking at all the entries in Manage->Custom Designed Parts - and Deleting any you don't need. Save and then try restarting. Adam
|
|